![]() This is because using Bookdown in Rstudio makes R look for Rstudio's own pandoc installation, which has the correct version of Pandoc's Citeproc. However one thing that is frustrating is that even though I am writing in sublime text and only need to run my "build" script pretty rarely, I still need to use RStudio to compile the document. Make it work better with my text editor, please.I wrote a nice R script that takes a bibtex document and makes a clickable lit review in html using Bookdown. I even believe it should be a priority if we consider that JabRef was primarily designed to work for LaTeX edition. While for text processors (word, LibreOffice), this may be a difficult task, I believe that for text editors (TeXniccenter, TexWorks, etc.), it is easy (the feature "just need" to be copied so that it inserts a \cite to another software). Scientists need Integration with OpenOffice!:.This goes beyong search and grouping (also it may be related). File link through Proceedings/Collection/Book entry.Extended Search Features -> integrated DOI search:.Search option within the focused field of the entry editor:.Add reverse cross-reference search to context menu:.New method of removing entry from group:.Dynamic faceted keyword tagging a la GMarks:.Easy definition of citations between entries:.Extending JabRef : saving relations between references:.Help me to make sense of my references, please. New subdatabase based on AUX file (biblatex):.However, maybe we should have a dedicated page to explain how to install it and use it with JabRef? Improve BibLaTeX support, please. I understand it is not the job of JabRef to take care of the installation and configuration of a versioning software. Make -importToOpen avaiable via Preferences:.Allow to set the newline character of the bib file:.Add Last changed date/time to each record:.pathname standards across different OS:.Optional lock file mechanisms to authorize access to one person only:.exporting the bibliography and the groups on the web:.BibSync a tool to share database and associated files:.Force journal (un)abbreviate when saving:.keep bibtexkey unique in all *.bib files:.Comparing and synchronizing databases:.Enabling multiple users at the same time on one db:.Multiple users privileges and backup:.Make JabRef serialization compatible with v2.9.2 again:.Nothing about facebook, twitter, researchgate, academia, diaspora, google , linkedin, or even myspace. Main issues found in the feature requests An idea: students could be given a group of feature requests to be integrated, so that they can concentrate on some parts of the software.For some requests, I could not find a dedicated category.A request may appear several times (e.g. ![]() In a given section, some requests are similar, but others are really identical.Some of the retained requests may not be relevant anymore (i.e.Based on the 480 feature requests which are currently open and not categorized as a possible bug or as possibly irrelevant request ("ToBeClosed").Classification based on my own perception of the main issues mentionned in the requests.Not to point at a specific request to be implemented, but to organize the wishes.Just intended to be helpful in defining where to go. The goal is to ease treatment of "old" feature requests, which should not get lost along the way. This list sorts and does not take into account features reported via GitHub (see ).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |